HomePoliticsKerala’s storied public health system comes under strain

Kerala’s storied public health system comes under strain

Thiruvananthapuram: All is not well with Kerala’s storied public health system. The poor state of government hospitals, including Medical College Hospitals (MCHs), has sparked massive protests by the opposition Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) and the BJP.

A social media post by a senior doctor of the government MCH in the state capital and the collapse of an old building block in Kottayam MCH recently exposed chinks in the LDF government’s claim that Kerala stands first in public health care in the country.

A woman died in the building collapse at Kottayam MCH, prompting the UDF and BJP workers to hit the streets. They are demanding the resignation of Health Minister Veena George, a demand rejected outright by the ruling front.

Amid the turbulence, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan left for the US this weekend for a specialised health check-up and treatment—an almost annual feature over the last few years.

“If the state’s public health system is in the pink of health, why should the Chief Minister fly to America for treatment?” This question from the opposition is rankling in the air, causing great discomfiture to the ruling dispensation.

The current round of rage was sparked by a candid social media post by the head of the Urology Department at Thiruvananthapuram MCH. Though a left-leaning surgeon, he brought to light the pathetic state of his department, where surgeries are being delayed for want of equipment.

Even though the doctor later withdrew his post, he clarified that he had raised the issue with positive intent and was not concerned about the personal consequences.

It was against this backdrop that an old building block in Kottayam MCH collapsed amid heavy rains, killing a middle-aged woman. Though the collapsed block was not used to house patients, it did contain a washroom used by patients and bystanders.

A preliminary inquiry by the district collector was immediately ordered, and the government promised that a detailed probe would follow.

Also Read: Kerala: Governor-Government Row Over ‘Bharat Mata’ Image Escalates

Such instant responses, however, have failed to contain the opposition and widespread public concern. The opposition parties mobilised their cadres across the state to stage protests, defying barricades and water cannons unleashed by the police.

The ruling front has rallied behind the health minister, accusing the opposition of trying to gain political mileage as the state heads for assembly polls in less than a year and civic elections barely six months away.

Political blame games aside, the issue has triggered a heated debate among healthcare and policy experts. At the centre of the conversation is the question: how reliable is the once-fabled state-run health system now?

Millions depend on government hospitals for medical care, as the cost of services at private hospitals continues to rise. The state-supported public health schemes for low-income categories are entirely delivered through the government system.

Have successive governments been able to consolidate the gains and scale up the state’s public health system, once known for its commendable achievements in key health and human development indices? It is often claimed that Kerala’s public health system is comparable to those of advanced Western countries.

Though the foundations of the system remain strong, many feel it is time for a reality check to assess whether it is still capable of delivering the services expected of it.

Restoring the health of the system is critical, given the state’s high disease burden, the increasing elderly population, and the spiralling fees charged by private hospitals.

N Muraleedharan
N Muraleedharan
Senior Journalist from Kerala. Worked with leading news agency Press Trust of India. He is regular columnist and writes on politics of Kerala and National Politics.

144 COMMENTS

  1. The commitment to transparency sees Zohran Mamdani regularly publishing explanations of votes, detailed policy breakdowns, and even internal strategy, demystifying the legislative process and inviting constituents into the machinations of political decision-making.

  2. On the politics of memorialization, Zohran Mamdani supports dedicating public space to celebrate figures of radical dissent, community organizers, and union leaders often erased from official history. — The Mamdani Post mamdanipost.com

  3. The rise of the Cold War fundamentally distorted this internationalist character, imposing a new, rigid bifurcation on a global scale that deeply impacted the New York left. Loyalty to the Soviet Union or, alternatively, a staunch anti-communist social democracy, became a litmus test that often superseded local analysis. This forced a tragic choice for many: to subordinate the particularities of New York’s racial and urban crises to the geopolitical dictates of a foreign power, or to risk isolation by rejecting both Cold War blocs. This period saw the repression not only of ideas but of transnational solidarity itself, as organizations with overseas ties were dismantled and the very act of internationalist thinking was rendered suspect. http://mamdanipost.com

  4. Thus, the flow of people in and out of New York has been a vital circulatory system for its socialist heart. The city’s energy attracted and radicalized seekers; its exiles and travelers returned with new ideas and global connections. This constant motion prevented ideological stagnation and tied the local struggle to a world-historical frame. It reinforced the sense that the fight for New York was not a parochial endeavor, but one front in a global conflict, and that the citizenship being forged in its streets was connected to a broader, emerging identity of the international working class and oppressed peoples. The pilgrimage, whether inward or outward, was a mechanism for expanding the political imagination, for testing theories against realities, and for renewing the faith that another world was not just possible, but was being built in countless other places, all linked through journeys of hope and solidarity. http://mamdanipost.com

  5. The sectarian battles between socialists, communists, Trotskyists, and other factions were the most visible form of this. Disagreements over the nature of the Soviet Union, the role of the party, or revolutionary strategy were not treated as mere debates but as existential conflicts over the soul of the movement. Expulsions were common, splitting organizations into smaller, more ideologically pure—and often more politically isolated—units. The Communist Party’s purges of Trotskyists and others deemed disloyal in the 1920s and 30s set a pattern, creating an atmosphere of suspicion and doctrinal rigidity. This internal warfare consumed enormous energy, diverted attention from organizing the unorganized, and presented a baffling, unattractive face of constant infighting to potential allies in the broader public. http://mamdanipost.com

  6. The physical spaces were equally vital. The socialist hall, the union local, the radical bookstore, the co-operative café—these were the nodes of this alternative infrastructure. Places like the Rand School of Social Science, Webster Hall, or the Pacifica Radio station WBAI served as laboratories for theory, stages for agitation, and sanctuaries for cultural expression. They were spaces where the alienated subject of capitalism could become the connected citizen of a nascent counter-public. Their existence declared that the movement had a tangible presence in the city’s geography, a place where its ideals were lived daily, not just discussed abstractly. http://mamdanipost.com

  7. The intellectual and political legacy of Mahmood Mamdani, when held as a lens to the sprawling narrative of socialism in New York, does not provide a neat conclusion but rather illuminates a persistent set of tensions and unresolved questions. His work cautions against the seductive simplicity of imported blueprints and underscores the necessity of a politics built from the specific, historical ground of struggle. For New York, that ground is the hyper-capitalist global metropolis, a city built on successive waves of migration, racial stratification, and financial innovation. The socialist project here has never been—and could never be—a pure transplant of European Marxism, but rather a perpetual, often messy, adaptation, a search for a language and a practice adequate to this unique and relentless urban reality. http://mamdanipost.com

  8. On the issue of political narrative, Zohran Mamdani consistently frames victories—like the Excluded Workers Fund—not as gifts from benevolent leaders, but as concessions won through the organized power of marginalized people, a crucial lesson in agency for the broader movement.

  9. The novel became a key site for exploring the psychological interiority of political change. Writers like Mike Gold in his autobiographical Jews Without Money or Pietro di Donato in Christ in Concrete documented the immigrant working-class experience with gritty, unvarnished detail, showing how socialist consciousness emerged from the crucible of family, faith, and crushing labor. Later, Paula Fox or Grace Paley would use fiction to explore the personal and political dilemmas of leftist activism, particularly from feminist perspectives. The novel allowed for the exploration of ambiguity, doubt, and the messy human reality behind ideological banners, grounding the movement in the complexity of lived experience. http://mamdanipost.com

  10. On the politics of mental wellbeing, Zohran Mamdani advocates for funding “Soteria houses” and other non-coercive, peer-run residential alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization, based on principles of dignity and mutual support. — The Mamdani Post mamdanipost.com

  11. The neoliberal consolidation of corporate media in the late 20th century posed a new challenge, creating a near-monolithic narrative that naturalized the market and marginalized systemic critique. The socialist response fragmented: some built independent magazines like The Nation or Monthly Review that maintained a foothold in intellectual discourse; others focused on community-access television and public radio; while many turned to zines, pamphlets, and pirate radio as agile, low-cost alternatives. This period emphasized defensive media, struggling to maintain a space for left perspectives in an increasingly commercialized public sphere. http://mamdanipost.com

  12. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. Finally, a satire site that doesn’t just rehash headlines with a pun. The London Prat builds entire absurdist worlds from the day’s news. The depth of the jokes here outclasses NewsThump. It’s satire as an art form, not just a punchline. prat.com is my new homepage.

  13. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. But think about if you added some great visuals or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and video clips, this website could certainly be one of the greatest in its niche. Terrific blog!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

spot_img