@the_news_21
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to quash FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for his alleged defamatory remark against Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti during a show on June 15 but said he will get protection from any coercive action if he continues to cooperate with the probe.
A bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna also transferred all FIRs filed against Devgan in different states, including Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Telangana, to Ajmer in Rajasthan.
The apex court had earlier granted Devgan protection from any coercive action in connection with the FIRs.
Several FIRs were lodged against Devgan for using a derogatory term for the Sufi saint in the news debate show called ”Aar Paar” on his channel on June 15. Devgan later tweeted an apology saying he was actually referring to Muslim ruler Alauddin Khilji and inadvertently ended up naming Chisti.
Devgan through his lawyer Mrinal Bharti had moved the top court seeking quashing of the FIRs saying it was a slip of the tongue and he had already expressed regret for the ”inadvertent” error.
He had told the apex court that “none of the FIRs said that public order was being disturbed”.
Senior advocate Manish Singhvi, appearing for Rajasthan, had opposed Devgan’s plea for quashing of the FIRs saying the investigation is the right of the police.
The apex court, while granting interim relief to Devgan, had also stayed the probe in the cases related to the telecast against the journalist. The journalist has said the plea concerned his life and liberty.
“In a well-orchestrated manner, the petitioner has been made a victim of country-wide filing of false and baseless criminal complaint and FIRs on the one hand, and on the other hand, petitioner, his family and his crew has been abused unabashedly on social media and by personal messages by unknown persons.
“The petitioner has also received several death threats from various anti-social elements,” Devgan”s plea submitted.
Devgan through his lawyer Mrinal Bharti had moved the top court seeking quashing of the FIRs saying it was a slip of the tongue and he had already expressed regret for the ”inadvertent” error.
He had told the apex court that “none of the FIRs said that public order was being disturbed”.
Senior advocate Manish Singhvi, appearing for Rajasthan, had opposed Devgan’s plea for quashing of the FIRs saying the investigation is the right of the police.
The apex court, while granting interim relief to Devgan, had also stayed the probe in the cases related to the telecast against the journalist. The journalist has said the plea concerned his life and liberty.
“In a well-orchestrated manner, the petitioner has been made a victim of country-wide filing of false and baseless criminal complaint and FIRs on the one hand, and on the other hand, petitioner, his family and his crew has been abused unabashedly on social media and by personal messages by unknown persons.
“The petitioner has also received several death threats from various anti-social elements,” Devgan”s plea submitted.
The Sufi saint’s dargah in Ajmer is an important pilgrimage centre and visited by thousands of people each day.
