The Delhi High Court heard a high-profile defamation case filed by Himayani Puri, the daughter of Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, over online content allegedly linking her to Jeffrey Epstein.
Allegations Called ‘False and Malicious’
Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for Himayani Puri, told the court that she is being targeted through “highly scurrilous” and defamatory posts.
He argued that the claims suggesting any connection with Epstein are completely false and imaginary, and part of a coordinated attack aimed at damaging her reputation.
Demand for Action Against Unknown Accused
Jethmalani sought a John Doe order against unidentified individuals behind the posts, stating that the allegations amount to serious charges of professional misconduct and moral wrongdoing.
Meta Opposes Global Takedown
Representing Meta Platforms India, Senior Advocate Arvind Datar argued that content blocking cannot be enforced globally.
He told the court that Meta can act only within India and only after receiving legal directions, adding that the issue of global blocking is already under consideration by another bench.
Journalists Raise Press Freedom Concerns
Counsel for journalists said certain statements were wrongly attributed to them and confirmed that the content had been taken down after being informed.
They argued that strict action could harm journalistic freedom, especially when global investigations like the Epstein case often rely on media reporting.
Court Notes Role of Investigative Agencies
The court observed that verifying such allegations is the responsibility of investigating agencies, not journalists, though it acknowledged the importance of responsible reporting.
Case Gains Attention
The case has drawn significant attention as it involves a Union Minister’s daughter, raising key questions around defamation, social media accountability, and freedom of expression in India.
