What Sparked the Clash Between BMC and Dharavi Residents? Unpacking the Tensions Over Mosque Demolition

Tensions flared in Dharavi, Mumbai, as residents protested the demolition of an unauthorized portion of a mosque. The situation escalated after a team from the Mumbai Municipal Corporation arrived to carry out the demolition, prompting hundreds of citizens to take to the streets in defiance. TV9 Reports indicate that the municipal vehicles were vandalized amid the unrest, leading to a significant police presence in the area to maintain order.

Eyewitness accounts reveal the community’s deep frustrations regarding the demolition. “There is a mosque at this place. The municipality has come for action under the name that it is unauthorized. This action was pending in view of the Municipal Corporation,” stated one local resident, who highlighted ongoing issues with the Dharavi rehabilitation project managed by Adani.

The eyewitness emphasized that the demolition feels politically motivated, stating, “We stand with Hindu-Muslim unity. Let there be Om, let there be Amin, let there be Rama, let there be Rahim. We celebrate all festivals together. The action taking place today is motivated by politics. They want to disrupt peace and order.” This sentiment reflects a broader concern among residents about the implications of the municipal actions on community harmony.

The resident further asserted that the municipality’s actions could disrupt the fragile peace in Dharavi. “Rehabilitation projects are underway, and all the construction is going to break down. If you are taking action at a place of worship under the name of unauthorized, you will not sit as a Dharavikar,” they warned. The message was clear: the community would not accept perceived injustices against their places of worship.

When questioned about whether prior notices had been issued before the demolition, the eyewitness responded, “Notices have been given earlier. At some places, we complained about unauthorized construction, and the municipality stated that the Dharavi rehabilitation project is with DRPD. If DRPD says, then action will be taken.” This indicates a complex interplay of bureaucratic processes and community grievances, with accusations of corruption surfacing in the conversation.

As the situation unfolds, the local community remains united in their opposition to the municipal actions, vowing to resist any further disruptions to their place of worship. The authorities are now tasked with addressing not only the legal aspects of the demolition but also the palpable anger and concern of the residents in Dharavi.