Court Denies Immediate Relief to Nida Khan
In a major development in the Nashik TCS case, the court has refused to grant interim protection to accused Nida Khan, dealing a setback to her legal team as her anticipatory bail plea remains under consideration.
Khan’s lawyers had requested temporary relief from arrest until the next hearing, but the court declined to pass any interim order at this stage.
The case has now been adjourned, with the complainant’s side being granted time till April 27 to file its written reply.
The decision marks a crucial turn in the ongoing case, especially as serious charges, including provisions under the SC-ST Act, continue to weigh heavily against the accused.
Complainant Gets More Time to File Reply
During the hearing, the lawyer representing the complainant sought additional time to submit a written response to Khan’s anticipatory bail plea.
The court accepted the request and fixed April 27 as the next deadline for the submission.
This means Nida Khan will not receive any legal shield from arrest in the meantime, increasing pressure as the matter moves forward.
Her legal team had argued that without interim protection, the accused could face immediate coercive action even before the bail plea is fully heard.
Defence Cites Pregnancy, Seeks Protection
While arguing for anticipatory bail, Nida Khan’s counsel cited medical grounds, informing the court that she is pregnant and seeking relief on humanitarian considerations.
Her lawyer, Advocate Rahul Kasliwal, argued that anticipatory bail hearings often take time, which is why the request for temporary protection was urgently needed.
According to the defence, there was insufficient material on record to justify the strict charges invoked in the FIR, especially those under the SC-ST Act.
Kasliwal reportedly argued that no concrete evidence had been presented to support the application of these serious provisions.
Prosecution Opposes Bail, Presents Evidence
The prosecution strongly opposed the anticipatory bail plea and opposed any immediate relief to Khan.
During the hearing, the prosecution reportedly placed photographs from a BPO picnic and trip before the court as part of its submissions.
Officials maintained that the allegations against Nida Khan are serious and claimed that the investigation points to her active involvement in the alleged activities under scrutiny.
The prosecution’s firm stand appears to have influenced the court’s decision to withhold interim relief.
SC-ST Act Charges Become Key Obstacle
One of the biggest hurdles in Khan’s bail plea is the inclusion of charges under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Police officials have earlier indicated that the presence of SC-ST Act provisions significantly weakens the chances of anticipatory bail, especially if the court strictly relies on the sections invoked.
A senior Nashik Police officer said investigators are confident about the evidence collected so far and believe Khan played a key role in the alleged conversion-related activities being probed.
Officials also claimed that more victims are connected to the matter, but many have not yet come forward due to fear and social pressure.
Pressure Mounts as Bail Hearing Continues
With interim protection denied, legal pressure on Nida Khan has intensified as she awaits the next hearing on her anticipatory bail plea.
The coming proceedings on April 27 could prove critical, as the court will examine the complainant’s reply and hear further arguments from both sides.
For now, the court’s refusal to grant interim relief signals that the matter is being treated with seriousness, leaving the accused without immediate protection.
What did the court decide in Nida Khan’s bail plea?
The court refused to grant interim protection to Nida Khan while her anticipatory bail plea remains pending.
Why was interim protection sought?
Her legal team sought temporary relief from arrest while the anticipatory bail hearing continues.
What grounds did Nida Khan’s lawyer cite?
Her lawyer cited medical grounds, stating that Nida Khan is pregnant, and also questioned the evidence under the SC-ST Act.
When is the next hearing in the case?
The complainant has been given time till April 27 to file a written reply, after which the court will continue hearing the matter.
