HomeThe News21 PulseBreaking the Taboo: Why Mental Health Must Become an Everyday Conversation

Breaking the Taboo: Why Mental Health Must Become an Everyday Conversation

India has expanded mental-health rights and services, but stigma still keeps many people from seeking timely care. Making mental health part of everyday conversation is therefore a social responsibility.

There is a sentence many of us have heard at some point: “It is all in your head.” Sometimes it is said casually, sometimes as advice and sometimes as an attempt to dismiss someone’s suffering. But behind those few words lies a much larger social problem—the tendency to treat mental health as something mysterious, embarrassing or even shameful. If a person develops diabetes, we encourage them to see a doctor. If someone breaks a bone, nobody tells them simply to “be strong”. Yet when a person experiences prolonged sadness, severe anxiety, emotional exhaustion, unusual behaviour or thoughts of self-harm, society can still respond with silence, judgement or superstition.

That attitude needs to change. Mental health is not separate from health; it is an essential part of it. According to the World Health Organization, nearly one in every seven people globally—about 1.1 billion people—were living with a mental disorder in 2021. Anxiety and depressive disorders were among the most common. Effective prevention and treatment options exist, yet many people with mental disorders still do not have access to effective care. The scale alone should tell us that mental health is not a marginal issue affecting only a small section of society. It is a public-health concern that reaches families, schools, workplaces and communities.

Understanding what mental health really means

Mental health does not simply mean the absence of mental illness. It includes our emotional, psychological and social well-being—how we think, feel and behave, how we cope with difficulties, maintain relationships, make decisions and respond to everyday challenges. Everyone experiences changes in mental well-being. Feeling sad after a loss, anxious before an examination or stressed during a difficult period does not automatically mean that a person has a mental disorder. The concern arises when symptoms become persistent, severe or disruptive enough to significantly affect everyday functioning, relationships, education, employment or physical health.

Depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and substance-use disorders are among the mental-health conditions that may require professional assessment and care. They are not character flaws or evidence of personal weakness. Understanding this distinction is important because it helps us avoid two opposite mistakes: medicalising every normal emotional experience while, at the same time, dismissing genuine mental-health problems that may require professional attention.

From confinement to care and rights

India has a long history of thinking about the mind and human well-being. Traditional systems such as Ayurveda and Unani medicine addressed mental distress in different ways, while families and communities also played a major role in care. The institutional development of modern psychiatry in India, however, was heavily shaped by the colonial period. Mental asylums developed in Bombay, Calcutta and Madras during the eighteenth century. Many early institutions were largely custodial, with an emphasis on separating people considered mentally ill from society rather than on the recovery-oriented, community-based and rights-focused care expected today.

Colonial legislation similarly focused heavily on institutionalisation and control. The Indian Lunacy Act of 1912 remained a central legal framework governing people with mental illness for decades. After Independence, the approach began to shift. Psychiatric care gradually expanded beyond isolated mental hospitals into general hospitals and community-based services. India launched the National Mental Health Programme in 1982, marking an important step towards integrating mental healthcare into the wider public-health system.

The Mental Health Act, 1987 represented another legislative development, but the more significant rights-based shift came with the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. The law received Presidential assent on April 7, 2017 and came into force on May 29, 2018. It seeks to provide mental healthcare and services while protecting, promoting and fulfilling the rights of persons with mental illness. The journey reflects an important transformation—from confinement and control towards treatment, dignity, recovery and rights. But changing laws and institutions is only one part of the challenge. Changing social attitudes can be much harder.

India’s treatment gap remains a warning

India’s National Mental Health Survey of 2015–16 remains one of the country’s most important large-scale assessments of mental-health conditions. The survey covered 39,532 eligible individuals across 720 clusters in 12 states, with 34,802 people ultimately interviewed. It estimated current mental morbidity at 10.6%, while lifetime prevalence was estimated at 13.7%. The survey also indicated that nearly 150 million Indians required active intervention for one or another mental-health condition. Perhaps the most troubling finding was the treatment gap. The overall treatment gap for mental morbidity was estimated at around 84.5%, with the gap for different conditions ranging broadly from about 70% to 92%.

These figures come from the 2015–16 survey and should not be presented as current prevalence estimates for 2026. They nevertheless remain important evidence of the scale of unmet mental-health needs identified in India. The treatment gap cannot be explained by the shortage of mental-health professionals alone. Awareness, affordability, accessibility, misinformation, fear and stigma also play a role. A person may realise that something is wrong but hesitate to seek help because of the fear of being labelled “mad”. Parents may worry that a diagnosis will affect their child’s future. An employee may fear professional consequences. Young people may worry that friends will begin treating them differently. When these fears discourage people from speaking openly or seeking timely help, mental-health problems can remain hidden.

When stigma becomes another barrier to care

Stigma operates in subtle ways. It appears when someone is called “weak” for seeking counselling, when mental illness becomes a family secret, when marriage prospects are considered more important than a person’s health or when someone is told simply to pray harder instead of being encouraged to seek appropriate professional care. Faith, family and community can provide valuable emotional support. But where professional intervention is required, they should complement appropriate medical or psychological care rather than replace it. The same principle we apply to physical health should apply to mental health. We would not normally expect someone to hide high blood pressure or diabetes to protect the family’s reputation. Mental-health conditions should not be treated differently because of embarrassment or fear of social judgement.

Stigma can also delay help-seeking. A serious condition left unrecognised or untreated can affect education, employment, relationships, physical health and overall quality of life. That is why telling someone merely to “be positive” is rarely an adequate response. We need environments in which people can say, “I am struggling. I need help,” without fearing ridicule or rejection—and where the response is compassionate, practical and appropriate.

Mental health is everyone’s concern

Mental healthcare cannot be left entirely to psychiatrists and psychologists. Parents can learn to recognise significant changes in their children’s behaviour. Teachers can develop enough mental-health awareness to recognise when distress should not simply be dismissed as laziness or indiscipline. Employers can create healthier workplaces where seeking psychological support is not regarded as incompetence. Friends and family members also have an important role. Helping does not always mean having an answer or offering a solution. Sometimes it means listening without immediately judging, mocking or comparing someone’s suffering with somebody else’s. Saying “I am here to listen” can be more helpful than saying “Others have bigger problems.”

At the same time, awareness must include an understanding of professional care. Counsellors, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers and other trained professionals have different roles. What kind of support a person needs should depend on their circumstances and, where necessary, appropriate professional or clinical assessment.

Access to mental-health services is expanding

There are signs of progress in India’s public mental-health system. The Government of India implements the National Mental Health Programme, under which the District Mental Health Programme has been sanctioned for implementation in 767 districts with support to States and Union Territories through the National Health Mission. Services envisaged under the programme at different levels include assessment, outpatient treatment, counselling and psychosocial interventions, continuing care and support for people with severe mental disorders, medicines and outreach services. Another major initiative is Tele-MANAS, the National Tele Mental Health Programme launched in October 2022 to expand access to mental-health support.

As of August 12, 2026, Tele-MANAS had handled more than 43.70 lakh calls through 53 cells, supported by 23 mentoring institutes and five Regional Coordinating Centres. Services are available across States and Union Territories, with support offered in multiple Indian languages. The expansion of such programmes shows that mental healthcare is increasingly being recognised as part of mainstream healthcare. But infrastructure alone cannot eliminate stigma. A helpline may exist, a hospital may exist and a mental-health professional may be available—but people still need to feel that asking for help is acceptable.

What needs to change

The first change has to happen in our everyday language. Words associated with mental illness should not be routinely used as insults, psychiatric conditions should not become punchlines, and a diagnosis should never be treated as a person’s entire identity. Mental-health education should also begin early. Schools and colleges can help young people understand emotional literacy, coping skills, healthy relationships and when professional assistance may be appropriate. Workplaces, similarly, need confidential and accessible systems of support, while families need to become spaces where distress can be discussed without shame. Public conversations must also move beyond awareness days and occasional social-media campaigns. Awareness becomes meaningful when it changes behaviour—when it makes somebody more willing to listen, less likely to judge and more comfortable seeking help when it is needed.

From taboo to everyday conversation

One misconception we need to overcome is the idea that talking about mental health somehow creates mental illness. It does not. Talking about mental health can create understanding, reduce misinformation and make it easier for someone who is struggling to seek support. Seeking help should not automatically be interpreted as weakness. Recognising that something is wrong and asking for assistance can itself require considerable courage. Recovery, too, does not always follow a straight line. Some people recover fully, while others live with long-term conditions that can be managed with appropriate treatment, support and continuing care. Mental healthcare should therefore be built around dignity, accessibility and continuity rather than judgement.

The goal cannot be a society in which nobody experiences sadness, anxiety, grief or emotional distress. Such experiences are part of human life. The goal should be a society in which nobody is forced to suffer in silence simply because they are afraid of being judged. India has travelled a considerable distance—from an era dominated by institutional confinement to a rights-based legal framework and expanding community and digital mental-health services. Yet one of the most difficult barriers cannot be removed by legislation, hospitals or technology alone. It is stigma. And breaking that barrier begins with the conversations we have every day.

Mental health should not be a secret. It should not be a family shame. It should not be a joke. It is health—and it deserves to be treated that way.

If you or someone you know is experiencing severe emotional distress or thoughts of self-harm, seek professional help promptly. In India, Tele-MANAS provides free, 24×7 mental-health support at 14416 or 1-800-891-4416.

Subscribe to TheNews21

Stay Ahead with Independent Journalism

Investigations, political analysis and major national and global stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Tanmayee Jadhav
Tanmayee Jadhav
Tanmayee Jadhav is a psychology graduate from Kalinga University, Raipur, and is currently pursuing a Post Graduate Diploma in Rehabilitation Psychology (PGDRP) at the Nai Subha Institute of Mental Health and Behavioural Sciences, an RCI-recognised institute affiliated with Dr Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University. She is currently an Associate Rehabilitation Psychologist (AR Psych.) Trainee. Her areas of interest include mental health, rehabilitation psychology, social awareness and community well-being. Tanmayee has gained practical exposure through internships and training programmes, including at the Institute for Psychological Health (IPH), Thane, founded by the late psychiatrist and mental-health advocate Dr Anand Nadkarni. Through her writing and professional training, she hopes to contribute to a more empathetic understanding of mental health and believes that supporting people through psychological and emotional struggles is both a professional responsibility and a deeply human endeavour.

Must Read

spot_img
spot_img