Bombay HC asks Mumbai collector what steps will be taken for demolition of 48 obstacles near city airport

@the_news_21

The Bombay High Court on Friday directed the Mumbai Suburban District Collector to state how he proposes to initiate demolition of the 48 obstacles caused by buildings and other structures located near the city airport for violation of height norms.

A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice M S Karnik also pulled up the collector for trying to shift the responsibility of demolition to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and said the collector has to do something about this “menace” (obstacles near the airport).

The court also suggested the authorities to disconnect electricity and water supply to those buildings that have been issued notice for height violation.

The high court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Yashwant Shenoy raising concerns over the dangers posed by high-rises near the Mumbai airport.

It was informed by the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) that periodic surveys are carried out and in 2010, a total of 137 obstacles (buildings/structures) were identified.

Out of these 137 buildings, final orders have been passed in 63 cases. Of these, appeals have been filed in nine cases and six buildings have complied. The remaining 48 structures need to be demolished immediately since there is no compliance or appeal filed, the court was told.

The bench on Friday also pulled up the collector for shirking his responsibility and stating in an affidavit filed in the high court that the demolition has to be done by the BMC as it is the planning authority of Mumbai.

The HC noted that there is no law that prevents the collector from initiating demolition process and held that it is for the collector to proceed with that action.

“It is the statutory mandate that after final orders are passed for demolition of a structure, it is for the collector to take steps and demolish those structures that are causing an obstacle to aircraft taking off and landing at the airport,” Chief Justice Datta said.

The court noted that the MIAL had informed the collector’s office about the 48 structures in November 2017 itself.

“An attempt being made to shift responsibility to the BMC is clear. We are not impressed with such an attitude. We do not approve of the collector moving responsibility to the BMC,” the court said.

“We direct the collector to file an affidavit indicating the steps proposed to be taken to demolish the 48 structures,” the court directed posting the matter for further hearing on August 22.

The court said the BMC and any other authority like the police shall render assistance to the collector for demolition.

The bench said it would pass orders with regard to the other obstacles identified by the MIAL from 2010 till now after the reply affidavit of the collector is filed on August 22.

“Those buildings that have been issued notices…start disconnecting their electricity and water supply,” Chief Justice Datta remarked.

MIAL’s counsel Vikram Nankani told the court that after the 2010 survey further surveys were also carried out and many other structures have been identified for demolition.