Top Court Says Earlier Directions on Institutional Areas Will Continue
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to alter its earlier order issued on November 25 regarding the removal of stray dogs from institutional premises, including schools, hospitals and other public facilities. The bench made it clear that its previous directions would continue to remain in force.
The court also clarified that stray dogs sterilised or vaccinated under civic animal control programmes cannot be released back into these sensitive public zones after treatment.
No Change in Rules for Public Institutions
During the hearing, the apex court refused pleas seeking changes in its earlier directives. The judges observed that institutional spaces such as educational campuses, healthcare centres and other public establishments require special protection due to safety concerns involving children, patients and the general public.
The court maintained that authorities must ensure stray dogs are removed from such areas while following the legal framework governing animal welfare and sterilisation procedures.
Sterilised Dogs Cannot Be Released Back in Same Areas
In a key clarification, the Supreme Court reiterated that stray dogs picked up from institutional premises should not be returned to the same locations after vaccination or sterilisation. The court said the earlier restriction would remain applicable.
The observation is expected to impact how municipal bodies and local administrations implement stray dog management policies near public institutions across the country.
Debate Over Public Safety and Animal Welfare Continues
The issue of stray dog control has triggered nationwide debate between animal welfare activists and residents concerned about increasing dog bite incidents. Several petitions before courts have highlighted rising concerns around safety in schools, hospitals and residential areas.
The latest order is likely to strengthen the powers of civic authorities in managing stray dog populations in designated institutional zones.
