Kolkata: A fresh legal challenge has been filed in the Supreme Court raising objections to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee personally appearing before the apex court in a case linked to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state. The application argues that her direct participation in the hearing was neither appropriate nor justified under constitutional conventions.
The objection follows the February 4 hearing, during which Mamata Banerjee became the first sitting chief minister to personally address the Supreme Court. During her submission, she requested the court’s intervention in the ongoing revision of voter lists in West Bengal, alleging that the process was harming democratic principles and unfairly singling out the state and its electorate.
The matter is part of a larger batch of petitions related to the SIR exercise and is scheduled to be heard by a bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and N V Anjaria.
The latest application has been moved by Satish Kumar Aggarwal, a former vice-president of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha. He contended that the personal presence of a chief minister in court could create indirect pressure on the judiciary and may affect the neutrality of proceedings, even if unintentionally.
According to the plea, the dispute is not a personal issue but one involving the constitutional functioning of the state and the Election Commission of India. It argues that such matters should be presented through officially appointed lawyers representing the state government, rather than by the chief minister herself.
The application further states that senior constitutional authorities must avoid personal court appearances in cases concerning governance, as this could blur the line between individual opinion and institutional position. It emphasizes that West Bengal is already represented by legal counsel, making the chief minister’s appearance unnecessary.
The plea also questions whether Mamata Banerjee could invoke Article 32 of the Constitution in this case, arguing that the matter does not involve any direct violation of her fundamental rights.
Mình tình cờ tìm hiểu về f8bet và đọc được bài này thấy khá dễ hiểu. Nội dung trình bày gọn gàng, đặc biệt là các thông tin cơ bản cho người mới. Đọc xong có cái nhìn tổng quan hơn chứ không bị rối.
Không biết mọi người sao chứ mình thấy F8bet dạo này được nhắc đến khá nhiều trên các diễn đàn. Thấy bảo ưu đãi và tỷ lệ cũng cạnh tranh, nên mình đang trải nghiệm thử. Có anh em nào chơi lâu rồi vào chia sẻ thêm cảm nhận cho mọi người cùng biết không?
Mình chơi thử bên F8bet một thời gian thấy khá ổn, giao diện dễ dùng mà nạp rút cũng nhanh. Trước hơi lo vấn đề thanh toán nhưng trải nghiệm thực tế lại mượt hơn mong đợi. Anh em mới tham gia thì cứ thử bản nhỏ trước cho quen tay cũng hợp lý.