X: @the_news_21
As the nation gears up for the highly anticipated general elections, a pivotal case challenging the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPATs) is set to unfold in the hallowed chambers of the Supreme Court. This legal battle has garnered widespread attention, with several prominent organizations and individuals petitioning the apex court to intervene and ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
At the heart of the matter lies the demand for the Centre and the Election Commission of India (ECI) to mandatorily cross-verify the EVM counts with the voter-verified paper trails recorded by VVPATs. The petitioners argue that the current practice of the ECI, which involves cross-verifying EVMs with VVPATs in only five randomly selected polling booths per assembly constituency, is grossly insufficient to guarantee the credibility of the results.
The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), spearheaded by the renowned advocate Prashant Bhushan, has been at the forefront of this legal battle. Their petition seeks specific directives from the Supreme Court, including mandating the ECI to cross-verify the EVM counts with all VVPAT slips, quashing the ECI’s guideline that allows only sequential verification of VVPAT slips, and granting voters the fundamental right to physically drop their VVPAT slips into a ballot box to ensure their votes are counted as recorded.
Underpinning the ADR’s arguments is the notion that every voter has an inalienable right to verify that their vote has been accurately recorded and counted. They have highlighted a “complete vacuum” in the existing laws and procedures, necessitating judicial intervention to uphold the principles of free and fair elections enshrined in the Constitution.
The ADR’s petition also seeks to enhance the transparency of the VVPAT process by making the glass of the VVPAT machine transparent and extending the duration of the light, allowing voters to witness the recording and dropping of their votes into the drop box. This measure, they argue, would instill greater confidence in the electoral system and alleviate concerns about potential discrepancies or tampering.
The controversy surrounding EVMs and VVPATs has been a recurring issue during elections, with political parties across the ideological spectrum raising concerns about the potential for tampering and the reliability of the machines. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party in Tamil Nadu has also thrown its weight behind the legal challenge, filing a petition in the Madras High Court to challenge the design of the third-generation M3 Electronic Voting Machines, citing potential discrepancies and corrupt practices.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this case of national significance, the nation’s attention is focused on the outcome, which could have far-reaching implications for the electoral process and the faith of voters in the democratic system. The court’s decision will play a pivotal role in addressing the concerns raised by various stakeholders and ensuring the integrity and transparency of the upcoming elections.
The ramifications of this legal battle extend far beyond the immediate electoral cycle. A ruling in favor of the petitioners could pave the way for comprehensive reforms, strengthening the safeguards against electoral malpractices and restoring confidence in the democratic process. Conversely, a decision upholding the current practices could potentially exacerbate existing doubts and fuel further controversies surrounding the use of EVMs and VVPATs.
With the general elections looming on the horizon, the Supreme Court’s ruling on this crucial matter is eagerly awaited by all stakeholders, including political parties, civil society organizations, and the electorate at large. This landmark case has the potential to shape the future of India’s electoral landscape and reinforce the principles of free, fair, and transparent elections – the bedrock of any vibrant democracy.
As the nation holds its breath, the Supreme Court’s judgment will undoubtedly be scrutinized and analyzed from every angle, with far-reaching implications for the sanctity of the democratic process and the integrity of the nation’s electoral machinery.
Also Read: BJP’s Rajeev Chandrasekhar in Rs 30 Crore Asset Row Over ‘Dubious’ Poll Affidavit
