X: @vivekbhavsar
Mumbai: The Maharashtra state cabinet, led by Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, recently decided to waive tolls for lighter vehicles at five entry points into Mumbai. This decision has come under intense scrutiny, with critics questioning the motives behind it, particularly since toll collection at these points is managed by MEP Infrastructure. This company is currently in financial distress and has filed for a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) with the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
With state assembly elections set for November 20 and the Election Commission’s code of conduct taking effect on October 15, the timing of the toll waiver raises concerns. Announced just before the code’s implementation, the waiver appears to be a populist tactic aimed at winning voter support, especially from urban commuters.
The decision has led to suspicions that the Shinde-led Mahayuti government is attempting to bail out the financially struggling MEP Infrastructure. Critics worry that the state may compensate the company for the toll revenue it will lose during the waiver period, potentially using taxpayer funds. This has fueled allegations that the government’s priority is to assist a private entity rather than protect public resources and ensure accountability.
This move has sparked significant debate about the transparency of the government’s decision-making process. Critics are demanding to know whether this waiver serves the public interest or is merely a strategy to rescue a company facing insolvency at the expense of taxpayers.
In parallel, the NCLT has admitted a plea under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by a public sector lender, citing a default of ₹127.86 crore. Following this, the NCLT has initiated the CIRP against MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd, appointing an interim resolution professional to oversee the company’s operations.
MEP Infrastructure has received financial assistance from Bank of India under multiple banking arrangements since March 2010. The company has previously sought to settle its debts out of court through one-time settlement (OTS) proposals submitted in September 2022, December 2022, and August 2023. However, these proposals were rejected by the financial creditor due to concerns over substantial haircuts and the lack of clarity regarding the source of funds.
MEP Infrastructure now faces a crucial turning point. The CIRP process allows creditors to either restructure the company’s debt or liquidate its assets if a resolution cannot be achieved. The company will need to find buyers or develop a viable plan to restore its financial health; otherwise, liquidation could ensue, leading to asset sales to pay off creditors.
In conclusion, the admission of the IBC plea against MEP Infrastructure represents a critical moment in the company’s financial saga. If the toll waiver is indeed linked to aiding this struggling company, public discontent may escalate, with accusations of prioritizing corporate bailouts over taxpayer accountability becoming a central theme in the discourse.
